Is the Regulative Principle Important to Worship by Carl Bogue

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reformed Covenanter

Cancelled Commissioner
I recommend listening to this address by Carl Bogue on the RPW, and how this doctrine is being set aside in his denomination:

SermonAudio.com - Regulative Principle Important

After listening to this, I can honestly say that I have more respect for people who clearly say that they do not believe the RPW, as opposed to those who claim to subscribe to WCF 21, yet totally ignore it in practice.
 
A question worth considering is if Confessional Presbyterians tolerate the virtual anarchy in worship that Rev. Bogue describes in this address, then can they really be surprised when people in these denominations openly go against the WCF's teaching on the doctrines of the gospel (i.e. Federal Visionism etc.)?

After all, there is little point complaining that FVers do not adhere to the WCF when other office bearers do not adhere to WCF 21, despite the fact that they pretend to.
 
Dr. Bogue's tract has served as an introduction to the RPW for 20 years now.
In 1988, Dr. Carl Bogue, long-time pastor of Faith Presbyterian Church (PCA), Akron, Ohio, wrote The Scriptural Law of Worship for Presbyterian Heritage Publications. This is a standard, traditional defense of the regulative principle, which subsequently has served many as a succinct introductory tract on the topic. The booklet deals with the nature of worship, the Scriptural law of worship, a specific example from the Bible of the principle (Nadab and Abihu), and results when the principle has been violated.109

109. Carl W. Bogue, The Scriptural Law of Worship (Dallas, Tex.: Presbyterian Heritage Publications, 1988); later reprinted, with slight modification and additions, as Scriptural Worship (Dallas, Tex.: Blue Banner Books, 1993).

As for the RPW and Confessionalism, he wrote this in a later piece.
When I was a seminary student in the UPC [United Presbyterian Church], the conservatives were distressed by the blatant liberalism among the faculty. Here were men who had taken vows and subscribed to the creedal standards of the church, while in the classroom they would mock and ridicule such doctrines as the substitutionary atonement, the unique authority of the Bible, Christ as the only way of salvation, and other such issues…. And yet I submit to you that it is the same question of integrity which we face in our current struggle. Though the doctrinal error is not so extreme, the question of integrity is the same. When we promise to “receive and adopt” the Westminster Standards, only to turn around and worship God in ways He has not commanded, how may we not question a person’s integrity?110
110. Carl W. Bogue, “Does the Regulative Principle Matter to the PCA?” The Presbyterian Advocate, ed. David C. Lachman, 3.3–4 (April–May 1993) 10.

Text from Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. with Chris Coldwell, "The Regulative Principle of Worship:Sixty Years in Reformed Literature Part One (1946–1999)." The Confessional Presbyterian 2 (2006) 129.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top