Eoghan
Puritan Board Senior
[BIBLE]Luke 11:2[/BIBLE]
The text of the sermon was "Thy will be done" from Luke 11. My problem was that it simply is not there! It is missing from the NIV, ESV and NASV yet the preacher took no pains to explain this, despite many if not most of his congregation not using the KJV. I found the words in Mathew 6 and thought that you could say that the words were in a parallel passage. I then checked the chronology and noted that the Mathew text was from the first year of Jesus ministry, the Luke text the third year of His ministry. Then I noticed that the context of Mathew was Jesus unprompted teaching, the Luke text was at the request of the disciples!
I know that expository preaching should be from the text giving due weight to context, so I feel let down on this occasion. Due diligence would have required some observations on the text and context, contrasting the two versions of the Lord's Prayer surely?
Maybe it just shows a pattern in which sermons have their origin in the preachers head more than the text before them. I find this sort of thing most unsatisfactory and instead of relaxing and giving my assent to an exposition of the Word I have to try and follow the flight and trajectory of a sermon which is anything but expository.
Is this a trend others see?
The text of the sermon was "Thy will be done" from Luke 11. My problem was that it simply is not there! It is missing from the NIV, ESV and NASV yet the preacher took no pains to explain this, despite many if not most of his congregation not using the KJV. I found the words in Mathew 6 and thought that you could say that the words were in a parallel passage. I then checked the chronology and noted that the Mathew text was from the first year of Jesus ministry, the Luke text the third year of His ministry. Then I noticed that the context of Mathew was Jesus unprompted teaching, the Luke text was at the request of the disciples!
I know that expository preaching should be from the text giving due weight to context, so I feel let down on this occasion. Due diligence would have required some observations on the text and context, contrasting the two versions of the Lord's Prayer surely?
Maybe it just shows a pattern in which sermons have their origin in the preachers head more than the text before them. I find this sort of thing most unsatisfactory and instead of relaxing and giving my assent to an exposition of the Word I have to try and follow the flight and trajectory of a sermon which is anything but expository.
Is this a trend others see?