Reformed Covenanter
Cancelled Commissioner
I realise that a similar discussion on Mark Jones and the covenant of works came up a while back, but my concern is not precisely the same as I have no issue with the notion of grace in the covenant of works. In the below quote, however, he says something that seems to lend weight to the notion that faith and works are conditions in the covenant of grace.
According to Westminster Larger Catechism 32, faith alone is the condition of the covenant of grace and, in that context, "condition" is being used in an improper sense, not as a moving or meritorious cause. To affirm that the covenant of grace is conditional in the proper sense would contradict WLC 31, as the covenant is founded on unconditional election. What Dr Jones says below sounds like a mixing of faith and works (I admit that that may not be his intention, but it does not sound good):
The conditions in both covenants are set by God and not man. In fact, generally speaking, in both covenants faith and works are required.
Joel R. Beeke; Mark Jones. A Puritan Theology (Kindle Locations 1531-1532). Kindle Edition.
N.B. To be clear, I am not saying that Dr Jones is a Federal Visionist because 1) he later goes on to disclaim neonomianism, and, 2) affirming a belief in the covenant of works is incongruous with Federal Visionism. Still, I can see why some people find his mode of expression concerning, though I may be mistaken.
According to Westminster Larger Catechism 32, faith alone is the condition of the covenant of grace and, in that context, "condition" is being used in an improper sense, not as a moving or meritorious cause. To affirm that the covenant of grace is conditional in the proper sense would contradict WLC 31, as the covenant is founded on unconditional election. What Dr Jones says below sounds like a mixing of faith and works (I admit that that may not be his intention, but it does not sound good):
The conditions in both covenants are set by God and not man. In fact, generally speaking, in both covenants faith and works are required.
Joel R. Beeke; Mark Jones. A Puritan Theology (Kindle Locations 1531-1532). Kindle Edition.
N.B. To be clear, I am not saying that Dr Jones is a Federal Visionist because 1) he later goes on to disclaim neonomianism, and, 2) affirming a belief in the covenant of works is incongruous with Federal Visionism. Still, I can see why some people find his mode of expression concerning, though I may be mistaken.