blhowes
Puritan Board Professor
Yesterday was a very enjoyable day. In addition to getting some work done around the house, I spent a good part of the day thinking about verses related to being 'under the law', especially:
Gal 4:4,5 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
What a blessing it is to think about Jesus being made under the law, so he could redeem us who were under the law, and adopt us.
After supper, I decided to reread the following articles from Matthew's retraction:
Gal 4:4,5 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
What a blessing it is to think about Jesus being made under the law, so he could redeem us who were under the law, and adopt us.
After supper, I decided to reread the following articles from Matthew's retraction:
- My Retraction: A 15 Year Reformed Baptist Turns Paedo-Baptist
- Prefatory notes on Infant Baptism
- Refuting Article 1 - The Principle of Hermeneutics
- Refuting Article 2 - The Importance of Baptism a Necessary Study, and Some Preliminary Considerations
- Refuting Article 3 - Paedo-Baptist Thinking
- Refuting Articles 4-5 - Positive Institutions
- Refuting Article 6 - Christianity is not Judaism[/list=A]
I was wondering if any Baptists (or paedobaptists, for that matter), especially those fairly new to the board, have read these articles? He gives a snapshot in these articles of his thinking as he went from credo to paedo, and I was wondering if there was any part of his reasoning that you disagreed with? What he said made sense to me, but I was wondering if you disagreed with any of it?
Before going to bed, and early this morning, I read this article:- I will be a God to you and to your children after you...[/list=A]
If you're a baptist and you've read this article, was there anything in this one that you disagreed with?
Towards the end, Matthew writes:
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of the Covenant of Grace, and its external administrations. Often Christians fall into the trap of asking the probing question, "But God, you said you would be a God to my children, but my little Betsy, or little Harry, is not saved!
It seems that, in the final analysis, paedo and credo baptists believe the same thing. Neither believe that God has given a blanket promise that all of a believer's children will be saved. Both believe that God blesses His word when parents faithfully instruct their children via the scriptures. Both believe that God's promise to Abraham will be savingly fulfilled in their children if, and only if, they are of the elect. As far as salvation is concerned, aren't both on the 'same page'?
- I will be a God to you and to your children after you...[/list=A]