LeeJUk
Puritan Board Junior
Hey well recently I've been looking into RC vs Protestantism.
So.. I've come up with a few questions.
1) Is it true when Catholics say historical Christianity, backs them up on the bread and wine not being merely purely symbolical? and that only when the reformation happened did this idea of it being symbolical come into the equation. e.g. those who learned from the apostles and church Fathers, had more RC views?
2) How do protestants respond to the Scott Hahn's interpretation that
there is a sheol in the OT which where the wicked and the saved went, and this is "hades" in the NT seperated from gehenna. and so this he claims (according to him the church fathers agree) that the 1 cor 3:10 is talking about hades where Christians will be basically purified and hades=purgatory.
TY.
So.. I've come up with a few questions.
1) Is it true when Catholics say historical Christianity, backs them up on the bread and wine not being merely purely symbolical? and that only when the reformation happened did this idea of it being symbolical come into the equation. e.g. those who learned from the apostles and church Fathers, had more RC views?
2) How do protestants respond to the Scott Hahn's interpretation that
there is a sheol in the OT which where the wicked and the saved went, and this is "hades" in the NT seperated from gehenna. and so this he claims (according to him the church fathers agree) that the 1 cor 3:10 is talking about hades where Christians will be basically purified and hades=purgatory.
TY.