elnwood
Puritan Board Junior
From what I understand, it seems like the universal consensus in NT scholarship of textual criticism is that the critical text is the closest to the autographs.
Does anyone know of any NT scholar (someone with a Ph.D. in NT and/or teaching NT at a recognized or accredited seminary) who supports the Majority Text as the closest to the autographs?
Does anyone know of any NT scholar (someone with a Ph.D. in NT and/or teaching NT at a recognized or accredited seminary) who supports the Majority Text as the closest to the autographs?