Scott
Puritan Board Graduate
How do you resolve the Omnipotence Paradox?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Turretin's 'compound and divided' senses handle it easily.
Originally posted by jdlongmire
Does restrained potential reduce capability?
Originally posted by biblelighthouse
Could an omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that even that being could not lift it?
It think the solution to this question is pretty simple . . . the solution lies in the fact that the question itself is logically flawed.
Part of the problem is that the question is actually trying to answer more than one question at once:
1) Is there any limit to the size of stone God could create?
2) Is there any limit to the size of stone God could lift?
The answer to BOTH questions is "No!"
God can create any size stone. Imagine a stone as big as you like, and God can create one bigger.
God can lift any size stone. Imagine a stone as big as you like, and God can lift it.
So, when we parse out those two parts to the question, the answers are quite simple to come by.
But, then, why is the original question itself such a doozy? It is so problematic because it not only asks two questions at once, but it simultaneously includes its own incoherence and inconsistency. This fact becomes clearer if we rephrase the question in more general terms. After all, we are not worried about the specifics of giant stones, but about the power of God itself, as demonstrated in the creation and lifting of them. So let's rephrase the Omnipotence Paradox thus:
Can an all-powerful being demonstrate such great power that he renders himself powerless?
As you can see, I have substituted "all-powerful" as a synonym for "omnipotent", "great power" for the creation of a big stone, and "powerless" for the inability to lift the big stone.
Once we rephrase the paradox as you see above, I hope you can see why the question itself is hopelessly flawed, and internally incoherent. It is like saying, "Can a number get so close to infinity that it becomes zero?" It is like saying, "Is it possible to get so smart that you become even smarter than yourself?" It is simply nonsense.
Thus, trying to answer the question is so baffling, because the question itself is incoherent and flawed, not because there is anything illogical about God's existence.
Originally posted by toddpedlar
I wish I could remember the source of this quote, but here's the best answer to: "Can God make a stone so large he couldn't lift it?"
"I don't know, but he can make a hell so hot you'll be sorry you ever asked!"
[Edited on 1-10-2006 by toddpedlar]
"See, I answer him that asketh, 'What did God do before He made heaven and earth?' I answer not as one is said to have done merrily (eluding the point of the question), 'he was preparing hell (saith he) for pryers into mysteries.'"
Originally posted by biblelighthouse
Could an omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that even that being could not lift it?
It think the solution to this question is pretty simple . . . the solution lies in the fact that the question itself is logically flawed.
Part of the problem is that the question is actually trying to answer more than one question at once:
1) Is there any limit to the size of stone God could create?
2) Is there any limit to the size of stone God could lift?
The answer to BOTH questions is "No!"
God can create any size stone. Imagine a stone as big as you like, and God can create one bigger.
God can lift any size stone. Imagine a stone as big as you like, and God can lift it.
So, when we parse out those two parts to the question, the answers are quite simple to come by. Thus, the answer to the question is simply, "No." God cannot create a stone to big for Him to lift, because He can lift any size stone.
But this does not mean there is a limit in the size stone God can create. It is not as if the answer of "no" to this question means that God can only create a stone yay big, and no bigger. Rather, His omnipotence is equally ultimate in both areas. He is all-powerful in stone creating ability, and He is all-powerful in stone lifting ability. This fact actually *supports* the fact of His omnipotence, rather than detracting from it.
But, then, why is the original question itself such a doozy? It is so problematic because it not only asks two questions at once, but it also simultaneously includes its own incoherence and inconsistency. This fact becomes clearer if we rephrase the question in more general terms. After all, we are not worried about the specifics of giant stones, but about the power of God itself, as demonstrated in the creation and lifting of them. So let's rephrase the Omnipotence Paradox thus:
Can an all-powerful being demonstrate such great power that he renders himself powerless?
As you can see, I have substituted "all-powerful" as a synonym for "omnipotent", "great power" for the creation of a big stone, and "powerless" for the inability to lift the big stone.
Once we rephrase the paradox as you see above, I hope you can see why the question itself is hopelessly flawed, and internally incoherent. It is like saying, "Can a number get so close to infinity that it becomes zero?" It is like saying, "Is it possible to get so smart that you become even smarter than yourself?" It is simply nonsense.
Thus, trying to answer the question is so baffling, because the question itself is incoherent and flawed, not because there is anything illogical about God's existence.
[Edited on 1-10-2006 by biblelighthouse]