RamistThomist
Puritanboard Clerk
What is your opinion on using (or finding) chiastic outlines in Scripture (or even ancient texts in general)? I used to be in proximity (geographical) to a lot of FV guys before they were FV guys and they were big on chiasms. On that basis I would be tempted to reject it, but I've seen a lot of other scholars from Jewish guys to Evangelical Baptists to mainline Protestants use chiasms as well, so i don't think it is a Jim Jordan thing. On one hand, it does make sense that ancients would organize the text this way, since it saves space (which they didn't really have) and provides a ready-made mnemonic device. I have to questions, though:
1. The charge of arbitrariness always looms in the background.
2. How do you preach from it?
In case one doesn't know, a chiastic outline would look like this
a.
b.
c.
c.
b.
a.
(or some variant).
As to arbitrariness, while that's a problem, I'll freely admit that a lot of passages of Scripture do not lend themselves to an easy "3 points and a poem."
1. The charge of arbitrariness always looms in the background.
2. How do you preach from it?
In case one doesn't know, a chiastic outline would look like this
a.
b.
c.
c.
b.
a.
(or some variant).
As to arbitrariness, while that's a problem, I'll freely admit that a lot of passages of Scripture do not lend themselves to an easy "3 points and a poem."