WCF XX:II. God alone is Lord of the conscience,[10] and has left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men, which are, in any thing, contrary to His Word; or beside it, if matters of faith, or worship.[11] So that, to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commands, out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience:[12] and the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also.[13]
III. They who, upon pretence of Christian liberty, do practice any sin, or cherish any lust, do thereby destroy the end of Christian liberty, which is, that being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, we might serve the Lord without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all the days of our life.[14]
I think I've been seeing the doctrine of Christian liberty corrupted and abused quite frequently on the PB lately. To be clear, I don't mean any spite or ill will towards these Christian brothers, just to warn them of an error I perceive.
When some one invokes CL to defend observance of holy days they completely turn CL upside down and make it to say exactly the opposite of what it intends. CL means we are free from doing practices besides the word of God, not that we are free to do them. Notice the WCF says obeying such commands is betrayal of CL.
Does anyone have any resources on CL, particularly the abuse of it to justify what I see as liturgical libertinism?
III. They who, upon pretence of Christian liberty, do practice any sin, or cherish any lust, do thereby destroy the end of Christian liberty, which is, that being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, we might serve the Lord without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all the days of our life.[14]
I think I've been seeing the doctrine of Christian liberty corrupted and abused quite frequently on the PB lately. To be clear, I don't mean any spite or ill will towards these Christian brothers, just to warn them of an error I perceive.
When some one invokes CL to defend observance of holy days they completely turn CL upside down and make it to say exactly the opposite of what it intends. CL means we are free from doing practices besides the word of God, not that we are free to do them. Notice the WCF says obeying such commands is betrayal of CL.
[12] COL 2:20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, 22 Which all are to perish with the using after the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh. GAL 1:10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. 2:4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: 5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you. 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Does anyone have any resources on CL, particularly the abuse of it to justify what I see as liturgical libertinism?