Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow! What a lady, what a speech! Even though her style of delivery would be mercilessly ridiculed in this country what she said was ”spot on”. I have to ask, even though off-topic, do you think Britain will actually be able to leave in October?
Wow! What a lady, what a speech! Even though her style of delivery would be mercilessly ridiculed in this country what she said was ”spot on”. I have to ask, even though off-topic, do you think Britain will actually be able to leave in October?
I understand there are a number of complex matters. The relationship between Scotland and England (Scotland getting subsidiaries from the EU) and the Irish issue. The way the relationship between the UK and the EU has been set up is that there are multiple links/networks operating which makes it difficult untangling them all.In short, the country was asked whether or not we wanted to remain in the EU. The political class didn't like the answer they got. They are doing their utmost to thwart the democratic will of the people. As it was recently said, "the betrayal of the many by the few!"
The current situation is that the legislation states that we will leave the EU, either with or without a deal on 31 October.
there are multiple links/networks operating which makes it difficult untangling them all.
Although we probably need to substitute 'German' for 'French' these days.
Rheinish, then.That'd spoil the rhythm!
Would it be more advantageous to go the route of proroguing Parliament rather than call a general election? Would Boris Johnson actually do it and is there a precedent for this? Is it known what the Queen’s views on Brexit are? Is there still general support for it among the populace? Is there any possibility that the remainders (political class) could engineer another referendum and overturn it? Sorry for all the questions but all this is truly fascinating.This has gone slightly off thread, but to continue off thread!
This brief video is interesting, especially from Maajid Nawaz, who is a remainer. The discussion is about proroguing Parliament, and the Queen's involvement. If parliament is suspended, we will simply leave on 31st October, as parliament won't be in a position to oppose it. The video can be found Here.
@Susan777
I don't think that a general election at this time is in the Conservative Party's interest. I also don't think it's in the interest of Brexit, as Parliament appears to be determined to stand in the way of implementing the Referendum of 2016 and I don't think a general election would change that.
Yes there is ample precedent for prorogation though the particulars here may be unique. What the Queen thinks and the undesirability of dragging her into a political quagmire are perhaps the chief arguments against it. I suspect that she thinks that the referendum, since it was held (by a huge margin of Parliament calling for it), should be implemented. But that's just my republican guess, though I've heard monarchists say the same.
I think that there is evidence for continuing strong support, and perhaps even increasing support, for Brexit. If there is a second referendum, it would have no appearance of fairness if it were something other than between deals, or between "stay" and "no deal," though all calls for a second referendum seem code for "stay." Fascinatingly, Corbyn has been historically a "leaver," though most of Labor (not Dennis Skinner--Old School!) is "remain."
One of the advantages of prorogation would be to stop the mouth of Speaker Bercow, who is quite partisan (he wants to remain and he hates Trump!) and always tiresome. I really would like to see him go for good and a fairer Speaker come into the chair.
Peace,
Alan
I may have said this here before, but when I sent Rees-Mogg one a few years ago he responded to this American with a hand-written letter. I was delighted!