Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Entertainment and Humor' started by Whitefield, Apr 13, 2009.
Post-Gen X meets nuclear waste?
Lou Christie sang "Two Faces Have I" but Sarah has him beat by a mile
X must be true or false. It cannot be both true and false at the same time in the same sense. It can't drive down the middle of the street because that would violate the law of the excluded middle.
sorry to go but I have a t-shirt that is XX but its too big for me ... ok ... back on target.
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:07:05 EST-----
I see your point .. maybe I'm being persuaded to alter my view on X.
What were we talking about again?
Here is the link which proves my proposition beyond a shadow of doubt ...
The Question of X
The title says Proposition X
This thread is going to cause me to believe in the Rapture.
How you'd do that!?
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:19:39 EST-----
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:21:00 EST-----
Leave my alone!
Do what? .. I simply found the authoritative link on X.
I have found better evidence...and it's prettier! Link
That's not going to convince anyone.
Ok see it now .. hmmm truth is measured by beauty .. interesting concept ... I'll be back ...
This shows X is true across the spectrum.
Try again...I just made you my friend for a little while.
Interesting discussion. Since your typing 'X' on your keyboard and scheme is based on the ASCII character set, the integer representation of 'X' is 88. Since computers actually only understand is binary our conversion from decimal to binary produces 1011000. Therefor, X is 1011000.
Excellent point ... and
10 = T
11 = r
00 = u
0 = e
10 = F
11 = a
00 = l
01 = s
0 = e
that 01 = s is a gloss inserted in the text by a scribe who was dyslexic and mistook the initial 10 in the series.
Methinks this is all a veiled attempt to seek to make fun of sound reasoning. This happens when one cannot come up with sound arguments and so humor is used to deflect and diffuse.
Hi Beth! Haven't seen you for forever!!!!!
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 10:07:20 EST-----
X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus.
But maybe this entire matter should be left to the elders of the tribe to decide.
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 10:12:46 EST-----
wow! but that
still impressive analysis
-----Added 4/13/2009 at 10:14:59 EST-----
Wait, wait, wait... what does the Decalogue have to do with a big shirt for dyslexic people?
I be here, same time, same bat channel.
That would be a XXXL and require a new translation using whatever manuscripts we can find at the basement in Wal-Mart
or in Whitefield's house
Also X is confessional, we have a chapter X in the WCF.
I guess what I am saying is that x has always been where x was and is and will be unless God deems otherwise.
Yep, already cited it!
I apologize for my platitude, I must have missed your OP.