Proposition X

Status
Not open for further replies.

cih1355

Puritan Board Junior
X must be true or false. It cannot be both true and false at the same time in the same sense. It can't drive down the middle of the street because that would violate the law of the excluded middle.
 

Whitefield

Puritan Board Junior
I was under the impression that something is always right only if it is XX; at least, anything less than XX must pretend that XX is always right, otherwise unspeakable horrors come upon the anything that is less than XX. I have no idea what this means, but I think I read it in "Dad's Tool Shed."
sorry to go :offtopic: but I have a t-shirt that is XX but its too big for me ... ok ... back on target.

-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:07:05 EST-----

X must be true or false. It cannot be both true and false at the same time in the same sense. It can't drive down the middle of the street because that would violate the law of the excluded middle.
I see your point .. maybe I'm being persuaded to alter my view on X.
 

OPC'n

Puritan Board Doctor
What were we talking about again?
Here is the link which proves my proposition beyond a shadow of doubt ...

The Question of X
How you'd do that!?

-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:19:39 EST-----

This thread is going to cause me to believe in the Rapture.
:lol::lol::lol:

-----Added 4/13/2009 at 09:21:00 EST-----

What were we talking about again?
The title says Proposition X :think:
Leave my
alone!
 

jandrusk

Puritan Board Sophomore
Interesting discussion. Since your typing 'X' on your keyboard and scheme is based on the ASCII character set, the integer representation of 'X' is 88. Since computers actually only understand is binary our conversion from decimal to binary produces 1011000. Therefor, X is 1011000.
 

Whitefield

Puritan Board Junior
Interesting discussion. Since your typing 'X' on your keyboard and scheme is based on the ASCII character set, the integer representation of 'X' is 88. Since computers actually only understand is binary our conversion from decimal to binary produces 1011000. Therefor, X is 1011000.
Excellent point ... and
10 = T
11 = r
00 = u
0 = e
 

OPC'n

Puritan Board Doctor
Interesting discussion. Since your typing 'X' on your keyboard and scheme is based on the ASCII character set, the integer representation of 'X' is 88. Since computers actually only understand is binary our conversion from decimal to binary produces 1011000. Therefor, X is 1011000.
Excellent point ... and
10 = T
11 = r
00 = u
0 = e
10 = F
11 = a
00 = l
01 = s
0 = e
 

Whitefield

Puritan Board Junior
Interesting discussion. Since your typing 'X' on your keyboard and scheme is based on the ASCII character set, the integer representation of 'X' is 88. Since computers actually only understand is binary our conversion from decimal to binary produces 1011000. Therefor, X is 1011000.
Excellent point ... and
10 = T
11 = r
00 = u
0 = e
10 = F
11 = a
00 = l
01 = s
0 = e
that 01 = s is a gloss inserted in the text by a scribe who was dyslexic and mistook the initial 10 in the series.
 

Beth Ellen Nagle

Puritan Board Senior
:think: Methinks this is all a veiled attempt to seek to make fun of sound reasoning. This happens when one cannot come up with sound arguments and so humor is used to deflect and diffuse. :gpl:
 

Rich Koster

Puritan Board Post-Graduate
X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus. :lol:
 

Whitefield

Puritan Board Junior
But maybe this entire matter should be left to the elders of the tribe to decide.

-----Added 4/13/2009 at 10:12:46 EST-----

X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus. :lol:
wow! but that :worms:
still impressive analysis

-----Added 4/13/2009 at 10:14:59 EST-----

:think: Methinks this is all a veiled attempt to seek to make fun of sound reasoning. This happens when one cannot come up with sound arguments and so humor is used to deflect and diffuse. :gpl:
huh? :scratch:
 

AThornquist

Puritan Board Doctor
X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus. :lol:

Wait, wait, wait... what does the Decalogue have to do with a big shirt for dyslexic people?
 

Rich Koster

Puritan Board Post-Graduate
X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus. :lol:

Wait, wait, wait... what does the Decalogue have to do with a big shirt for dyslexic people?
That would be a XXXL and require a new translation using whatever manuscripts we can find at the basement in Wal-Mart
 

OPC'n

Puritan Board Doctor
X = 10 so it must be referring to the Decalogue, which is true. Therefore if we reference the LXX, there is a 2 to 1 preponderance of the Xs vs Ls so I must side with the Xs. However if we take note that the X is a Roman numeral, we must reject it because it would reference the faulty Decalogue contained in the RC translation and render this satire completely bogus. :lol:

Wait, wait, wait... what does the Decalogue have to do with a big shirt for dyslexic people?
That would be a XXXL and require a new translation using whatever manuscripts we can find at the basement in Wal-Mart
or in Whitefield's house
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top