i agree. the debate was won by bahnsen hands down. i just enjoyed the way he refuted sproul's notion of probability. it was classic bahnsen.....another series to get is his tapes on theonomy and its critics..he does an excellent job on critiquing kline (just a side note)Originally posted by bigheavyq
Yes, he blew sproul away.
their were questions that sproul had trouble even answering, He didn't prove his statement that presuppositionalist is the same as fideism.
Bahnsen was on a roll when it ended. I wish they could have had a follow up.
Sproul's problem was like everyone who debates bahnsen. They underestimate him.