PointyHaired Calvinist
Puritan Board Junior
Hey all,
I have recently been reading through "Reformation Principles Exhibited", the RPCNA Testimony, and the UP Confessional Statement of 1925. I don't agree fully with them, but have found them edifying, interesting, and they sound like an excellent idea - put a church statement on topics the Westminster divines did not or could not address. It could solve a lot of arguments over things like FV, evolution, etc. I pretty much agree with the RPCNA Testimony, except its view on EP and its all-but-condemnation of alcohol and tobacco use. (I like the former, haven't touched the latter in a long time.)
Has there ever been a move in the ARP, PCA, OPC, or any of the other Reformed bodies to publish as "supplemental" standard similar to this?
I have recently been reading through "Reformation Principles Exhibited", the RPCNA Testimony, and the UP Confessional Statement of 1925. I don't agree fully with them, but have found them edifying, interesting, and they sound like an excellent idea - put a church statement on topics the Westminster divines did not or could not address. It could solve a lot of arguments over things like FV, evolution, etc. I pretty much agree with the RPCNA Testimony, except its view on EP and its all-but-condemnation of alcohol and tobacco use. (I like the former, haven't touched the latter in a long time.)
Has there ever been a move in the ARP, PCA, OPC, or any of the other Reformed bodies to publish as "supplemental" standard similar to this?