Bill,I have no interest in arguing with you over this matter. I agree that Dr. White is a fine apologist and a gift to the church. I also believe that there are objective standards by which to judge such matters and that one need not himself be an expert in order to deduce this. I find these things to be rather self-evident, and in fact if they were not, we would be hopelessly lost when it comes to seeking reliable sources of information. At any rate, I certainly did not intend to be churlish, and if I came off as such, then I apologize.
I'm sorry but this response is utterly befuddling. You believe that there are objective standards by which these things can be judged and that we'd be utterly lost without them. Can you at least provide a link to these objective standards? Where someone might have written about these objective standards? I'm widely read and I'm not aware of any but I'd be happy to read them so I can judge for myself whether Dr. White possesses absolutely no expertise that anyone could possibly defend.