The problem here is that JMF is anti-historicist while RSC is anti-biblicist. I agree with biblicism, but not anti-historicist biblicism. Likewise, I agree with historicism, but not anti-biblicist historicism. The reformed tradition is historically biblicist and biblically historicist.
I don't really want to get off topic here but I have a question.
Rev. Winzer,
Is Dr. Clark, in your opinion, antibiblicist because he doesn't adhere to 24/7? I believe he veers off the path concerning this and the Confession. JMO.