De Jager
Puritan Board Junior
Greetings,
I am looking for some help on understanding Romans 14:22-23.
Background: I am a very detail-oriented person and tend to be very scrupulous, with OCD-like tendencies. I often examine my actions extremely closely and tend to be very hard on myself.
In life, we often have to make decisions about matters that are not extremely clear. For a person who is scrupulous and craves certainty in all matters, this is extremely hard for me.
What makes it harder is that Romans 14:23 tells us that "anything that is not of faith, is sin". Does this mean that if we do something that we are unsure of (as to its morality), it is sin? Does 100% conviction on a matter need to be present before we can do that thing? Is our natural disposition to be one of abstinence from anything that we are not completely convinced on?
For example, let's say I have to make a decision at work. My conscience might tell me 'that is immoral'. Suppose I do not roll over and play dead, and start to argue with my conscience. Suppose I can provide a legitimate argument against my conscience; however, a nagging fear and doubt is still present. I can intellectually argue against what my conscience is saying; however, I still cannot do that thing with no doubts or fears whatsoever. In such a situation, may I then do that thing? Is the conscience to be followed even when it is not rational?
Is it possible that Satan can hijack a believer's conscience and use it against him? Is the conscience free from the effects of the fall? I would think not - the conscience is not infallible, is it? If it is not infallible, how do we know when to follow it?
Let's provide another example. I have weighed the arguments for and against the baptism of covenant children. I have often told people that I am about 90% convinced that it is the right thing to do, but there are still lingering doubts. No, I am not satisfied at 90%, but let's say within the next 5 years I have a child and the question comes up. Would I be violating my conscience if I still had some doubts and baptized the child anyways? Of course, the alternative would be to defer baptism, which I would also have doubts about - so it would seem that no matter what I chose, I would not be 100% sure about it. And based on my understanding of Romans 14:22-23, I would be sinning, no matter what route I took.
When Paul says "he who doubts is condemned if he eats", and then "anything that is not of faith, is sin" does that mean that every moral decision we make must be grounded in 100% assurance? What if you have nagging anxiety??
I am looking for some help on understanding Romans 14:22-23.
Background: I am a very detail-oriented person and tend to be very scrupulous, with OCD-like tendencies. I often examine my actions extremely closely and tend to be very hard on myself.
In life, we often have to make decisions about matters that are not extremely clear. For a person who is scrupulous and craves certainty in all matters, this is extremely hard for me.
What makes it harder is that Romans 14:23 tells us that "anything that is not of faith, is sin". Does this mean that if we do something that we are unsure of (as to its morality), it is sin? Does 100% conviction on a matter need to be present before we can do that thing? Is our natural disposition to be one of abstinence from anything that we are not completely convinced on?
For example, let's say I have to make a decision at work. My conscience might tell me 'that is immoral'. Suppose I do not roll over and play dead, and start to argue with my conscience. Suppose I can provide a legitimate argument against my conscience; however, a nagging fear and doubt is still present. I can intellectually argue against what my conscience is saying; however, I still cannot do that thing with no doubts or fears whatsoever. In such a situation, may I then do that thing? Is the conscience to be followed even when it is not rational?
Is it possible that Satan can hijack a believer's conscience and use it against him? Is the conscience free from the effects of the fall? I would think not - the conscience is not infallible, is it? If it is not infallible, how do we know when to follow it?
Let's provide another example. I have weighed the arguments for and against the baptism of covenant children. I have often told people that I am about 90% convinced that it is the right thing to do, but there are still lingering doubts. No, I am not satisfied at 90%, but let's say within the next 5 years I have a child and the question comes up. Would I be violating my conscience if I still had some doubts and baptized the child anyways? Of course, the alternative would be to defer baptism, which I would also have doubts about - so it would seem that no matter what I chose, I would not be 100% sure about it. And based on my understanding of Romans 14:22-23, I would be sinning, no matter what route I took.
When Paul says "he who doubts is condemned if he eats", and then "anything that is not of faith, is sin" does that mean that every moral decision we make must be grounded in 100% assurance? What if you have nagging anxiety??