Devin
Puritan Board Sophomore
I've been working through Romans in-depth for the first time recently, and I'm stuck on what to think of this particular verse.
Romans 3
12For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. 14For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them 16on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus.
I first interpreted Paul as simply saying that the way that the law could justify someone is not by hearing but by doing perfectly, which no one can do.
However, to supplement my studies, I've been listening to John Piper's series on Romans, and he gave a different interpretation. He seemed to be saying that the verse isn't prescribing how one could be justified by the law, but is describing who will be justified period. Therefore, the "doers of the law" are like the righteous people in the Old Testament who were not sinless and yet strived to serve God to the best of their abilities.
I'm not thoroughly convinced of either interpretation, so any helpful insight would be much appreciated.
Romans 3
12For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. 14For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them 16on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus.
I first interpreted Paul as simply saying that the way that the law could justify someone is not by hearing but by doing perfectly, which no one can do.
However, to supplement my studies, I've been listening to John Piper's series on Romans, and he gave a different interpretation. He seemed to be saying that the verse isn't prescribing how one could be justified by the law, but is describing who will be justified period. Therefore, the "doers of the law" are like the righteous people in the Old Testament who were not sinless and yet strived to serve God to the best of their abilities.
I'm not thoroughly convinced of either interpretation, so any helpful insight would be much appreciated.