Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have been blessed in many ways, and I have always been able to provide a Christian education for my children, yet I know with a slight turn of events, I might not have had that ability. When my first wife died, I had a large income (I was working in software engineering) and I was able to have the children go to a private Christian school. If I had not been so well off financially, I would have had to send the children to public school. So while I want a Christian education for my children, I can see that some might not be able to accomplish that. A widow(er) might not have that choice. So if there are Christians going to that school, are you ministering to them by helping the school?
I only say this to raise a possibility that perhaps the school which you are so against might not be so single minded. I know if I were teaching there, it certainly would not be single minded.
That is quite a statement. I work in a public school, and while all of what you say is also there, there are also things that are supporting the cause of Christ. There is a chapter of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, there is a Christian group that meets for prayer every week (there is also a Muslim student group, but it is not any more supported than the Christian group), there are teachers that are a light in a dark place that will talk with students when they ask questions. The purpose of most public schools is not as dark as what you might think. In a sense, it is dark, as it purposely does separate teaching of all subjects from "taking every thought captive to Christ" (which is why I home school my own children). Yet I fully recognize that is not an option for all parents.
I have been blessed in many ways, and I have always been able to provide a Christian education for my children, yet I know with a slight turn of events, I might not have had that ability. When my first wife died, I had a large income (I was working in software engineering) and I was able to have the children go to a private Christian school. If I had not been so well off financially, I would have had to send the children to public school. So while I want a Christian education for my children, I can see that some might not be able to accomplish that. A widow(er) might not have that choice. So if there are Christians going to that school, are you ministering to them by helping the school?
I only say this to raise a possibility that perhaps the school which you are so against might not be so single minded. I know if I were teaching there, it certainly would not be single minded.
There is always a way. I do not believe it is within Christian liberty to have a child's mind formed by an unbelieving system 8-10 hours per day, regardless of the possibility that there might be a few genuinely Christian teachers and activities trying (unsuccessfully) to stem the tide.
If my premise is correct, that it is a Christian's obligation not to put children under the instruction of ungodly systems, then by definition there are options. God has given us everything we need for life and godliness, and He will always provide means for the believer to obey Him. It might be desperate and hard, but it is there.
I respectfully disagree with your premise. If what you are saying is true, then every parent that sends their children to public school ought to be brought up on charges within their church, even if the church cannot provide the education to the children. Your premise being wrong means all that follows is irrelevant.
To say that God in his providence does not put people into positions which are impossible to have their children given a Godly education would mean that those people that were deported to Babylon by force were there only because the parents did not find a way to comply with your principle. I don't buy it.
I can certainly see that if a person has a choice, they should exercise that choice to educate their children in Christian schools, or through home schooling. But saying that there is always a way seems presumptive.
The burden of proof is on your side to show that, Biblically, it is acceptable for a parent to voluntarily (as in, not by force) put their children under the instruction of unbelievers during the formative years of their lives.
My example is plain: regardless of your poverty or desperation, there most certainly is a way for a Christian in the United States to have a child taught by believers. Someone, somewhere will say yes to helping them. And there is a way to get there and take advantage of that love. And that is not presumptive.
God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men, which are, in anything, contrary to his Word; or beside it, if matters of faith, or worship.
Would everybody be exhorting Jeremy to do this if it were a Muslim madrassa? A Cambodian re-education camp? How 'bout a Christian Identity white supremacist summer camp for kids? Or even more appropriate, repaint a temple of Molech, where children are passed through the fire?
Not much difference between them all and a public school. They are all places where the Lord is despised and the devil is hard at work trying to keep children from the truth and lead them down the path to destruction.
Public schools just do it in a more subtle fashion, so they are a little easier to swallow. Which makes them even more devious.
-----Added 6/21/2009 at 10:42:26 EST-----
I seriously doubt that Jesus would have encouraged the disciples to go help the Romans maintain a facility wherein they forcefully took Jewish children to convince them that the faith of their fathers was false and to hold to pagan beliefs and practices.Wwjd?
Sorry, no. You are the one making a positive assertion that something is a sin when there is no specific command that forbids it. You are the one saying that the Word forbids allowing people other than Christians to educate a child, and you have not demonstrated that explicitly or from necessary consequence of what is in scripture.
Before you can claim that something is sin, you have to prove the subject is prescribed in scripture. Your assertion that it is sin makes your claim to fall under "matters of faith". Therefore it is up to you to prove that your assertion is true ... it is not up to anyone to prove that what you are saying is false if you have not first proven it true. You haven't.
smhbbag
Scott, in order to ask God for grace to go through with this even if I don't want to would require me to believe it's not sin. As long as I believe it's sin, I can't really ask God for grace to help me get out there and do it anyway.
I have an objection to a premise of yours - that this helps poor people. This whole ministry I am a part of exists to help poor people indiscriminately with health issues, job issues, etc. while teaching the gospel.
I love to do those things "without regard," and for His sake, as you say. But I think helping this school is a bad thing that hurts the poor, and to help the school is to perpetuate a system that rejects the gospel and hurts the subjects who enter its doors.
There are Christians from my church who teach there. And they do their best to counteract what influence the rest of the teachers give. But the school is rotten, root and branch, and any child who escapes it with a sound mind intact is the recipient of a miracle from God.
sounds like the reason you are volunteering to clean this school is because it is poor. Normally, outsiders in a ministry aren't responsible or needed to clean publicly supported schools. They have janitors and their management is responsible to keep the premises clean and safe. This sounds like a situation where something is broken, and they are, for whatever reason poor and needy- isn't that why the ministry group is targeting this school to clean it?This whole ministry I am a part of exists to help poor people indiscriminately
There are Christians from my church who teach there. And they do their best to counteract what influence the rest of the teachers give.
The scriptures are too numerous to mention, and frankly I'm shocked it's being questioned. Every mention of rearing a child in a household of faith, raising a child in the way he ought to go, to bring up little ones where Scripture permeates their entire environment - on doorposts and foreheads.
I notice a common thing in all of those scriptures, though: all of them are referring to spiritual training and not to reading, writing, and mathematics. Parents are certainly called to train their children in the Lord, but it doesn't follow that they can't delegate other things, even to a public school. I know many good Christian kids who have come out of the public schools, and have even shone the light of Christ into public schools.
Would everybody be exhorting Jeremy to do this if it were a Muslim madrassa? A Cambodian re-education camp? How 'bout a Christian Identity white supremacist summer camp for kids? Or even more appropriate, repaint a temple of Molech, where children are passed through the fire?
Not much difference between them all and a public school. They are all places where the Lord is despised and the devil is hard at work trying to keep children from the truth and lead them down the path to destruction.
Public schools just do it in a more subtle fashion, so they are a little easier to swallow. Which makes them even more devious.
-----Added 6/21/2009 at 10:42:26 EST-----
I seriously doubt that Jesus would have encouraged the disciples to go help the Romans maintain a facility wherein they forcefully took Jewish children to convince them that the faith of their fathers was false and to hold to pagan beliefs and practices.Wwjd?
Brad, I believe your examples are excellent and make good sense to me. Jesus didn't help the money changers set up their tables outside the temple did he?
I find it disconcerting that many of you would press the man to disobey his scruple of conscience, one that is borne from a Biblically-informed study. You don't have to agree with it, but to advise him in this regard is not very charitable. Notice, he didn't ask if he should or should not do this. He asked how he should approach the session of his church with his declination.
In a few weeks, we are participating with other local churches in something called "Hope for Durham," and our church will be cleaning and painting a local public school in a very poor area. I am very conflicted about this. Actually, I'm not at all and I don't want to have anything to do with it. Am I wrong?
As for children shining the light of Christ into the public schools, I'd love to see a scripture reference on that. Nowhere is that even implied - our children are not to be the shock-troops of evangelism; we are.
No, Jeremy, you're not wrong. You should obey your conscience, and humbly approach the session to let them know why you cannot participate.
I haven't read through all the posts yet, but one thing just hit me. Don't we engage with non-Christians organizations all the time? Yet does it mean we are supporting the spread of the heathen gospel of hedonism. I mean painting a school, I think, falls way to the bottom of the list of something that constitutes support when compared with giving money to an organization or company who's owner(s) believes in tolerance and hedonism. Anyone use windows? or any microsoft software? Bill Gates does support "Gay Rights" and spreads his message of tolerance around the globe, does that mean you are supporting his cause by patronizing his products? I don't think so...
But if you have the conviction to not have anything to do with an organization or company pertaining to the world, then... I certainly as a sister wouldn't ask one to participate in it. But I must say one's options will be severely limited.
I find it disconcerting that many of you would press the man to disobey his scruple of conscience, one that is borne from a Biblically-informed study. You don't have to agree with it, but to advise him in this regard is not very charitable. Notice, he didn't ask if he should or should not do this. He asked how he should approach the session of his church with his declination.
Technically, Ladies, yes, you're both right. A flippant oversight on my part: my apologies. My main point, contextually, is that he's already resolved as to what he should do, and the way I understood his post was according to his last few sentences, wherein he was asking for suggestions as to how he should approach his elders.
Technically, Ladies, yes, you're both right. A flippant oversight on my part: my apologies. My main point, contextually, is that he's already resolved as to what he should do, and the way I understood his post was according to his last few sentences, wherein he was asking for suggestions as to how he should approach his elders.
I'm out of thanks...so I just wanted to thank you. I also wanted to apologize, I guess I only skimmed the original OP and thought that he was asking for our opinions...... my apologies ,Jeremy, if I've caused any offense.....it was truly not intended!
I haven't read through all the posts yet, but one thing just hit me. Don't we engage with non-Christians organizations all the time? Yet does it mean we are supporting the spread of the heathen gospel of hedonism. I mean painting a school, I think, falls way to the bottom of the list of something that constitutes support when compared with giving money to an organization or company who's owner(s) believes in tolerance and hedonism. Anyone use windows? or any microsoft software? Bill Gates does support "Gay Rights" and spreads his message of tolerance around the globe, does that mean you are supporting his cause by patronizing his products? I don't think so...
But if you have the conviction to not have anything to do with an organization or company pertaining to the world, then... I certainly as a sister wouldn't ask one to participate in it. But I must say one's options will be severely limited.
All I could muster was a "wow" but you've summed up my thoughts on this quite well. Thank you.
I'm out of thanks...so I just wanted to thank you. I also wanted to apologize, I guess I only skimmed the original OP and thought that he was asking for our opinions...... my apologies ,Jeremy, if I've caused any offense.....it was truly not intended!