SRoper
Puritan Board Graduate
I was in a recent conversation where some were advocating that we should take quality of life into consideration when making decisions about whether to withhold treatment from a newborn. At the time I dismissed quality of life as something to consider, but then I thought about the following scenario. Suppose someone is dying of cancer and it is believed that chemotherapy will only delay death for two months. Is it a morally justifiable decision for the patient to decide to end treatment so that the time he has left would be more enjoyable? If yes, is this not allowing quality of life into the discussion?