elnwood
Puritan Board Junior
We've had a number of posts recently about the difference between different Presbyterian denominations. A lot of the differences, historically and at present, have to do with whether women can be deacons or elders, whether RE or TE.
Female pastors are the reason that the CRC was booted from NAPARC, and presumably the reason the EPC is not a part of NAPARC. The PCA formed in part because of opposition to female elders.
And while each denomination's Book of Church Order states their position on ordaining women, the historical Reformed confessions are completely silent on it.
One reason I bring it up is that I know people in both the PCUSA and CRC who can fully subscribe to their historical confessions, and yet support female elders.
One of the purposes of the Confessions historically has been to stop the spread of false doctrine. In their time, they were written against Roman Catholicism and the Anabaptists, and they served their purpose with regard to those errors. Those errors did not creep into the churches.
Yet, with respect to the contemporary issue of female elders, the confessions haven't been effective. Liberalism crept into the churches, and many of the present confessionally Reformed denominations were created out of denominations that fell into liberalism. Perhaps if the confessions had originally stated that females were excluded from eldership, it would have helped prevent liberalism from entering into the Presbyterian and Dutch Reformed denominations.
In 2000, the Southern Baptist Convention, recognizing the need to continually update their confession of faith to prevent doctrinal error, revised the Baptist Faith and Message to state that only men shall be pastors.
Do you think the Westminster Standards, London Baptist, and the Three Forms of Unity should also be revised?
Female pastors are the reason that the CRC was booted from NAPARC, and presumably the reason the EPC is not a part of NAPARC. The PCA formed in part because of opposition to female elders.
And while each denomination's Book of Church Order states their position on ordaining women, the historical Reformed confessions are completely silent on it.
One reason I bring it up is that I know people in both the PCUSA and CRC who can fully subscribe to their historical confessions, and yet support female elders.
One of the purposes of the Confessions historically has been to stop the spread of false doctrine. In their time, they were written against Roman Catholicism and the Anabaptists, and they served their purpose with regard to those errors. Those errors did not creep into the churches.
Yet, with respect to the contemporary issue of female elders, the confessions haven't been effective. Liberalism crept into the churches, and many of the present confessionally Reformed denominations were created out of denominations that fell into liberalism. Perhaps if the confessions had originally stated that females were excluded from eldership, it would have helped prevent liberalism from entering into the Presbyterian and Dutch Reformed denominations.
In 2000, the Southern Baptist Convention, recognizing the need to continually update their confession of faith to prevent doctrinal error, revised the Baptist Faith and Message to state that only men shall be pastors.
Do you think the Westminster Standards, London Baptist, and the Three Forms of Unity should also be revised?