S.T. Coleridge, Aids to Reflection:
This frustration is probably shared by nearly everyone who has attempted to reason with someone about the grounds of their acceptance or rejection of a particular idea.
The indisposition, nay, the angry aversion to think, even in persons who are most willing to attend, and on the subjects to which they are giving studious attention, as political economy, biblical theology, classical antiquities, and the like,--is the phenomenon that forces itself on my notice afresh, every time I enter into the society of persons of in the higher ranks. To assign a feeling and a determination of will, as a satisfactory reason for embracing or rejecting this or that opinion or belief, is of ordinary occurrence, and sure to obtain the suffrages of the company. And yet to me this seems little less irrational than to apply the nose to a picture, and to decide on its genuineness by the sense of smell.
This frustration is probably shared by nearly everyone who has attempted to reason with someone about the grounds of their acceptance or rejection of a particular idea.
Last edited: