Scott Bushey
Puritanboard Commissioner
Recently, in another thread, the topic arose in regards to issues of silence in Gods word. Apparently, some feel as if the concept of necessary inference to be an attack upon sola scriptura. My premise was to this brother was that it is not an attack on sola scriptura or any less honorable to Gods word to utilize the theological interpretation known as necessary inference. Is it not also true for the person whom rejects NI that it must follow, to be consistant, one must (even) do away with one's interpretation of the trinity as it is solely derived under this discipline.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?