I'm a presupper, but check out the following quote by Spurgeon.
It is clear from the above that Spurgeon isn't an evidentialist; and it seems clear that he isn't a total presuppositionalist because, as I understand presuppositionalism, you demostrate to the unbeliever the folly of his worldview by showing him that he cannot make sense out of the world with his worldview (i.e. logic, uniformity, morality). Spurgeon isn't going to do this. He simply says to the unbeliever that God has said it and we don't have a right to use our reason to judge Him or His word. I would classify Spurgeon as a partial presuppositionalist since he's not going to do the internal critique.
Any thoughts?
I am never at trouble about the attacks of infidels or heretics, however vigorously they may assault the doctrines of the Gospel, I will leave them alone; I have no answer for their logic; if they look to be resisted by mere reason, they look in vain; I have the simple answer of an affirmation, grounded upon the fact that God had said it. It is the only warfare I will enter into with them. If they must attack the rear let them fight with Jehovah himself. If the doctrines of the Gospel be as base as they say they are, let them cast discredit upon God, who revealed the doctrines; let them settle the question between God's supreme wisdom and their own pitiful pretensions to knowledge.--Charles Spurgeon, The New Park Street Pulpit, "The Vanguard and Rereward of the Church"
It is clear from the above that Spurgeon isn't an evidentialist; and it seems clear that he isn't a total presuppositionalist because, as I understand presuppositionalism, you demostrate to the unbeliever the folly of his worldview by showing him that he cannot make sense out of the world with his worldview (i.e. logic, uniformity, morality). Spurgeon isn't going to do this. He simply says to the unbeliever that God has said it and we don't have a right to use our reason to judge Him or His word. I would classify Spurgeon as a partial presuppositionalist since he's not going to do the internal critique.
Any thoughts?