Reformed Covenanter
Cancelled Commissioner
The pro-choice crowd do not always come out and say that they advocate abortion in order to destroy the concept of human beings having inalienable natural rights, to promote the depopulation agenda, and encourage promiscuity without consequences. Instead, they often claim to be doing so in order to protect a woman's right to choose, ensure that they have access to healthcare, stop poor women from being burdened with unwanted children, and shield vulnerable women from the effects of rape and incest. Most of us on the pro-life side take such assertions with a pinch of salt. Are we breaking the ninth commandment if we do not take their claims about their motives at face value? Should we ignore the circumstantial evidence (and sometimes direct evidence) which suggests that their motives are not so benevolent as they would have us believe?