Paedo Premises and Conclusion on the Priesthood of Christ and New Covenant Membership:
P1: Christ is the High Priest of all New Covenant members
P2: Christ did not make atonement for the non-elect.
P3: There are at least some non-elect in the New Covenant.
C: Christ, as High Priest, did not make atonement for all New Covenant members.
To the paedo's: Do you hold to P1, P2 and P3? Will you affirm the conclusion I made from those premises? For now, I assume the answer is yes, as many Reformed paedo's in my life outside this board have affirmed this for me.
So.....a few observations:
We all recognize that the Old Covenant offered shadows, types, and copies of the great reality that was to come in the New Covenant. The Old Covenant High Priest made atonement sacrifice on behalf of every single Old Covenant member without exception.
Leviticus 16:31-33
Yet, supposedly Christ, as High Priest of the New Covenant, does NOT make atonement for His NC people. He only makes atonement for the elect subset of the NC people. Some are left without blood offered on their behalf.
As Reformed people, we have a choice (lol, no pun intended, honestly). We can either have continuity on the role and work of the High Priest "“ or we can have continuity on the Covenant membership. Not both, for they exclude each other by definition. Hopefully this is pretty apparent.
If we have continuity on the work of the High Priest (namely that Christ, just as the OC priests, made atonement for all His NC people) "“ then we have a fully elect membership in the New Covenant - and a discontinuity relative to the mixed membership in the Old. But, if we have continuity on the membership (seeing non-elect in the NC just as the Old), then we have a discontinuity on the High Priesthood "“ because not all members of the NC are offered atonement by their High Priest (Christ), whereas in the OC every single member was given an atonement sacrifice by their High Priest.
More discontinuity for the paedo: The OC High Priests mediated for the GOOD of all their covenant people.....while Christ does not. He mediates cursings and judgment on some of His NC people, and has intended from the beginning to bring such judgment on his New Covenant non-elect. In scripture, it is a blessing to have a good High Priest represent you before God.....yet, in the paedo view, the non-elect NC member having a PERFECT High Priest is a source of greater eternal condemnation.
With all this considered, the OC High Priesthood doesn't seem to be a very good shadow, copy or type of Christ's Priesthood at all, for the paedo at least. For the paedo, the key function (sacrifice) and relation of the High Preist to the covenant people is radically different in the OC and NC.
Your thoughts?
[Edited on 7-3-2005 by smhbbag]
P1: Christ is the High Priest of all New Covenant members
P2: Christ did not make atonement for the non-elect.
P3: There are at least some non-elect in the New Covenant.
C: Christ, as High Priest, did not make atonement for all New Covenant members.
To the paedo's: Do you hold to P1, P2 and P3? Will you affirm the conclusion I made from those premises? For now, I assume the answer is yes, as many Reformed paedo's in my life outside this board have affirmed this for me.
So.....a few observations:
We all recognize that the Old Covenant offered shadows, types, and copies of the great reality that was to come in the New Covenant. The Old Covenant High Priest made atonement sacrifice on behalf of every single Old Covenant member without exception.
Leviticus 16:31-33
The priest who is anointed and ordained to succeed his father as high priest is to make atonement. He is to put on the sacred linen garments 33 and make atonement for the Most Holy Place, for the Tent of Meeting and the altar, and for the priests and all the people of the community.
Yet, supposedly Christ, as High Priest of the New Covenant, does NOT make atonement for His NC people. He only makes atonement for the elect subset of the NC people. Some are left without blood offered on their behalf.
As Reformed people, we have a choice (lol, no pun intended, honestly). We can either have continuity on the role and work of the High Priest "“ or we can have continuity on the Covenant membership. Not both, for they exclude each other by definition. Hopefully this is pretty apparent.
If we have continuity on the work of the High Priest (namely that Christ, just as the OC priests, made atonement for all His NC people) "“ then we have a fully elect membership in the New Covenant - and a discontinuity relative to the mixed membership in the Old. But, if we have continuity on the membership (seeing non-elect in the NC just as the Old), then we have a discontinuity on the High Priesthood "“ because not all members of the NC are offered atonement by their High Priest (Christ), whereas in the OC every single member was given an atonement sacrifice by their High Priest.
More discontinuity for the paedo: The OC High Priests mediated for the GOOD of all their covenant people.....while Christ does not. He mediates cursings and judgment on some of His NC people, and has intended from the beginning to bring such judgment on his New Covenant non-elect. In scripture, it is a blessing to have a good High Priest represent you before God.....yet, in the paedo view, the non-elect NC member having a PERFECT High Priest is a source of greater eternal condemnation.
With all this considered, the OC High Priesthood doesn't seem to be a very good shadow, copy or type of Christ's Priesthood at all, for the paedo at least. For the paedo, the key function (sacrifice) and relation of the High Preist to the covenant people is radically different in the OC and NC.
Your thoughts?
[Edited on 7-3-2005 by smhbbag]