Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do we inherit the sin nature then by genetics, or does the Lord somehow have us formed in that state when conceived?The doctrine is taught within Scripture.
WSC Question 18. Wherein consists the sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell?
Answer. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists in
the guilt of Adam’s first sin,
the want of original righteousness, and
the corruption of his whole nature
which is commonly called original sin;
together with all actual transgressions which proceed from it.
[Rom. 5:12, 19; Rom. 5:10-20; Eph. 2:1-3; James 1:14-15; Matt. 15:19.]
And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in
his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s
sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth;
neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have
done (Genesis 8:21).
Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother
conceive me (Psalm 51:5).
The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as
soon as they be born, speaking lies (Psalm 58:3).
Our Lord, taking it for granted to be known by all who heard him, spoke of original sin:
"If ye, then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children...." (Matthew 7:11)
God creates a soul and the guilt and sin of Adam is immediately (not mediately) imputed to the person. This is the creationist view, versus traducianism (see the recent thread on this view).Do we inherit the sin nature then by genetics, or does the Lord somehow have us formed in that state when conceived?
Maybe the same answer applies as to the Levites paying tithes:Do we inherit the sin nature then by genetics, or does the Lord somehow have us formed in that state when conceived?
So when we were conceived, God imputed to us the results of the Fall of Adam, as in now having a sin nature that is spiritual dead?God creates a soul and the guilt and sin of Adam is immediately (not mediately) imputed to the person. This is the creationist view, versus traducianism (see the recent thread on this view).
The guilt of Adam's sin is counted as our own guilt; we can be punished for it and it affirms that our nature is corrupted.
Worth a read:
http://www.amazon.com/Imputation-Adams-Sin-John-Murray/dp/0875523412
And so this is the reason for the Virgin Birth, in order to allow for Jesus to be born and not associated with the sin of Adam?We inherit the nature by spiritual genetics, even though (I believe) that God creates the soul.
And so this is the reason for the Virgin Birth, in order to allow for Jesus to be born and not associated with the sin of Adam?
it also seems that many are against Original Sin concept due to them seeing Augustine as being the one behind it, and seeing Him not using scriptures but philosophy and Catholic doctrines to get that doctrine.It is not the only reason, but it is the most "up front" reason. Another reason is the typology: a virgin messed it up, another virgin was instrumental in un-messing it up.
it also seems that many are against Original Sin concept due to them seeing Augustine as being the one behind it, and seeing Him not using scriptures but philosophy and Catholic doctrines to get that doctrine.
In other words, we were in Adam's loins when he sinned.
And so this is the reason for the Virgin Birth, in order to allow for Jesus to be born and not associated with the sin of Adam?
Yes.So when we were conceived, God imputed to us the results of the Fall of Adam, as in now having a sin nature that is spiritual dead?
Those against it, as Jacob noted, just have finite notions of "fairness" for starters. They even go so far as to say they could have done better than Adam if placed in his situation. Sigh. God made Adam as a perfect representative of all his progeny. We could not have, nor could we ever elect, a better representative.it also seems that many are against Original Sin concept due to them seeing Augustine as being the one behind it, and seeing Him not using scriptures but philosophy and Catholic doctrines to get that doctrine.
Help me out here...? I understand Gen.2:23-25 to be an oblique and beautiful way of describing Adam's joy at finding his "missing" complement, and the natural result.a virgin messed it up
Help me out here...? I understand Gen.2:23-25 to be an oblique and beautiful way of describing Adam's joy at finding his "missing" complement, and the natural result.
I don't see the tale as it's told eliciting the conclusion the above statement seems to make.