But I find it interesting that in one breath you say it was not the Lord's Supper and in another say it was "uniquely" for the Supper. I will, however, give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are simply arguing your point from both sides.
At no point did I say that the Supper was not intended by breaking of bread in Acts 20. You must be confusing two different points of the discussion.
And again as I began this discussion, though I DO believe the Lord's Supper was celebrated weekly. What I see in scripture indicates to me that the Supper was celebrated weekly (or more often in some cases if you see some particulars in 1 Cor. that way). And I also believe we have testimony from history that the early church celebrated the Supper weekly.
Then we can agree that the texts of Scripture indicate weekly communion to one who is already predisposed towards weekly communion; but it cannot be established by impartial interpretation of the text of holy Scripure that weekly communuion was practised in the apostolic church.