Originally posted by Don
I see no problem with actually granting the unbeliever logic, induction, et al., so long as it is not autonomous logic, induction, et al.
Don,
Not taking theh unbeliever to task for using logic, induction, et al. would be to "œgrant" them to him. However, you said you grant them to him solong as it is not along autonomous grounds. Basically, if you were debating an atheist, you´d end up saying, "œI grant you the use of logic, induction, et al. so long as you don´t do so autonomously"?
In other words, you grant him the use of logic, induction, et al. so long as he submits his autonomous thinking to God. . . .