Laura
Puritan Board Junior
The title is quoting "A Debtor to Mercy Alone" and the phrase ends, "...with me can have nothing to do." I heard a sermon tonight on Luke 13:6-9, the barren fig-tree. The application to the members of the congregation was that we must remember both the kindness and the severity of God, and that we do not know the "hidden boundary line" between His patience and His wrath. In other words, don't presume on God's grace, and bear fruit in keeping with repentance.
I understand how the fruit of the Spirit and assurance of faith are closely intertwined, but assurance wasn't ever mentioned. I see how pointing Christians to their duty from the Word is good and right and we need to be stirred up to love and good deeds. I do not see how threatening Christians into "bearing fruit" is. Maybe during the sermon I was thinking too much of a poem I once heard, and so am attributing too much of the poem's spirit to the sermon, but regardless, here is a stanza (it is by John Bunyan, drawn from the same parable, and every stanza ends the same way to emphasize the urgency of the command):
What, barren here! in this so good a soil?
The sight of this doth make God’s heart recoil
From giving thee his blessing; barren tree,
Bear fruit, or else thine end will cursed be!
If I am understanding the poem in the context of the parable, I can only see three options:
a) we are Pelagians who believe that it is our duty to bring forth the fruit of the Spirit, and if our efforts are not good enough, then we will be cast off by God;
b) we are aware that not all who profess faith are truly regenerate, and as their works before God are not borne of the Spirit and covered by Christ's blood, they will indeed be eternally cut off from God; or
c) we are Calvinists who believe that God does require that His people bear the fruit of a new heart; yet that fruit is ultimately wrought in them by God's own Spirit, and our status as His beloved people does not change regardless of our degree of sanctification or "fruit-bearing," in which case the application of this poem and the sermon I heard Confuses Me Greatly.
I thought there was a fundamental difference between the fear of God that a Christian has---a reverent yet childlike disposition to please Him---and the fear of God that an unbeliever has, which is more like hatred of God mixed with fear of judgment. In short, what place does fear of judgment have in a Christian's life? I thought we were supposed to take refuge in Christ, knowing that we have been saved unto His service, rather than anxiously eyeing the law, counting up our failures to bear fruit, and counting on something akin to threats to stir us up to obedience.
One last thing: is it possible that the parable of the barren fig tree is chiefly directed toward Jerusalem in Jesus' time, who would not repent and believe on account of His signs or His words? Then there would be no personal application to "bear fruit or be cut off," which would resolve my confusion. Any help on this front is much appreciated, and I hope I have not been too long-winded or confusing in the way I've written.
I understand how the fruit of the Spirit and assurance of faith are closely intertwined, but assurance wasn't ever mentioned. I see how pointing Christians to their duty from the Word is good and right and we need to be stirred up to love and good deeds. I do not see how threatening Christians into "bearing fruit" is. Maybe during the sermon I was thinking too much of a poem I once heard, and so am attributing too much of the poem's spirit to the sermon, but regardless, here is a stanza (it is by John Bunyan, drawn from the same parable, and every stanza ends the same way to emphasize the urgency of the command):
What, barren here! in this so good a soil?
The sight of this doth make God’s heart recoil
From giving thee his blessing; barren tree,
Bear fruit, or else thine end will cursed be!
If I am understanding the poem in the context of the parable, I can only see three options:
a) we are Pelagians who believe that it is our duty to bring forth the fruit of the Spirit, and if our efforts are not good enough, then we will be cast off by God;
b) we are aware that not all who profess faith are truly regenerate, and as their works before God are not borne of the Spirit and covered by Christ's blood, they will indeed be eternally cut off from God; or
c) we are Calvinists who believe that God does require that His people bear the fruit of a new heart; yet that fruit is ultimately wrought in them by God's own Spirit, and our status as His beloved people does not change regardless of our degree of sanctification or "fruit-bearing," in which case the application of this poem and the sermon I heard Confuses Me Greatly.
I thought there was a fundamental difference between the fear of God that a Christian has---a reverent yet childlike disposition to please Him---and the fear of God that an unbeliever has, which is more like hatred of God mixed with fear of judgment. In short, what place does fear of judgment have in a Christian's life? I thought we were supposed to take refuge in Christ, knowing that we have been saved unto His service, rather than anxiously eyeing the law, counting up our failures to bear fruit, and counting on something akin to threats to stir us up to obedience.
One last thing: is it possible that the parable of the barren fig tree is chiefly directed toward Jerusalem in Jesus' time, who would not repent and believe on account of His signs or His words? Then there would be no personal application to "bear fruit or be cut off," which would resolve my confusion. Any help on this front is much appreciated, and I hope I have not been too long-winded or confusing in the way I've written.