Thomas Gataker's Annotations

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have heard that the best Reformed commentary on Isaiah is the Annotations on Isaiah by Thomas Gataker. Any thoughts on this?

Has anyone read English Puritan exegesis as reflected in Thomas Gataker's Annotations on Isaiah -- Toward an equitable assessment of historic biblical interpretation (2001) by Kenneth Glen Casillas?
 
James Darling, Cyclopedia Bibliographica (1854), Vol. 1, 1221:

In the Assembly's Annotations, he wrote on the Books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Lamentations, so admirably that [Edmund] Calamy has observed that no commentator, ancient or modern, is entitled to higher praise.
 
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
I have heard that the best Reformed commentary on Isaiah is the Annotations on Isaiah by Thomas Gataker. Any thoughts on this?

Has anyone read English Puritan exegesis as reflected in Thomas Gataker's Annotations on Isaiah -- Toward an equitable assessment of historic biblical interpretation (2001) by Kenneth Glen Casillas?

anyone.gif
 
This title looks interesting:

Thomas Gataker B.D. his vindication of the annotations by him published upon these words, Thus saith the Lord, learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signes of heaven, for the heathen are dismayed at them. Jer. 10. 2. Against the scurrilous aspersions of that grand imposter Mr. William Lillie; as also against the various expositions of two of his advocates, Mr. John Swan, and another by him cited, but not named: together with the annotations themselvs. Wherein the pretended grounds of judiciary astrologie, and the Scripture-proofes produced for it, are discussed and refuted. Imprimatur, Edm. Calamy. April 12. 1653. by Thomas Gataker

Type: English : Book : Microform
Publisher: London : Printed by J.L. for Humphey [sic] Robinson and Joshua Kirton, in Pauls Church-Yard, 1653.
OCLC: 55722123
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top