Goodcheer68
Puritan Board Sophomore
VT writes “To be “neutral” implies that synthesis is prior to analysis for God as well as for man.
…If God were not absolute, if for him analysis does not have significance prior to and apart from synthesis, man would have to interpret the facts for himself.”
I understand God doesn’t think in a linear/ discursive manner so he doesn’t analyze and synthesize so how is VT using these words? I also get that if God had to synthesize he would come to understand the facts as new facts appeared so interpretation would be a joint effort between God and man, but how does analysis fit in here?
…If God were not absolute, if for him analysis does not have significance prior to and apart from synthesis, man would have to interpret the facts for himself.”
I understand God doesn’t think in a linear/ discursive manner so he doesn’t analyze and synthesize so how is VT using these words? I also get that if God had to synthesize he would come to understand the facts as new facts appeared so interpretation would be a joint effort between God and man, but how does analysis fit in here?