openairboy
Puritan Board Freshman
I'm reading Van Til's "Defense of the Faith", and I think I'm missing a paragraph or sentence in my book. Can someone help me out?
The bottom of page 179 in Chapter IX, "Argument By Presupposition", reads, "Does this imply the end of all reasoning? Only he who assumes, with the Romanist, that it is possible to find a firm foundation for human predication on some form or other of non-Christian thought, can claim that it does. But once we have followed the development of non-Christian thought and motivation." This is where the page ends, and page 180 follows with, "found that it always leads toward the destruction of predication, we think otherwise."
Can anyone fill in the missing sentence/s or paragraph?
Thank you,
openairboy
The bottom of page 179 in Chapter IX, "Argument By Presupposition", reads, "Does this imply the end of all reasoning? Only he who assumes, with the Romanist, that it is possible to find a firm foundation for human predication on some form or other of non-Christian thought, can claim that it does. But once we have followed the development of non-Christian thought and motivation." This is where the page ends, and page 180 follows with, "found that it always leads toward the destruction of predication, we think otherwise."
Can anyone fill in the missing sentence/s or paragraph?
Thank you,
openairboy