RamistThomist
Puritanboard Clerk
I saw a reconstructionist make this argument in favor of fathers baptizing their kids.
It may be said concerning Ananias that because he administered the sacrament of baptism for Paul, he must have therefore been ordained. This is, unfortunately, nothing more than begging the question, where the argument assumes the answer it ought to be proving. This creates a vicious circle of circular reasoning that has no proof given whatsoever.
It may be said concerning Ananias that because he administered the sacrament of baptism for Paul, he must have therefore been ordained. This is, unfortunately, nothing more than begging the question, where the argument assumes the answer it ought to be proving. This creates a vicious circle of circular reasoning that has no proof given whatsoever.