Westminster Divines on Christmas

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is far too general and strange a phrasing of the question. Is there some specific contention you've read that could be evaluated? It is true that when they had no political power the puritans in England had to have services, and many thought it was better to do that and have some positive influence than to simply have the populace run riot (it was a very ungodly time of year in their day). When the Westminster assembly was meeting and before parliament had made a political decision on outlawing the holiday, there was a debate amongst the divines whether to hold such services. Calamy said, no, Lightfoot convinced him and most otherwise, though some did not preach. Lightfoot thought they should until parliament settled the issue. While the did not think it sin to preach sermons on the day, they did think such preaching must include addressing the abuses and superstition of the day.
 
As Chris notes, the individual opinions on how to deal with different situations differed. But as for the official position of the Assembly, it can be found in the Directory of Public Worship as follows:

"AN APPENDIX,
Touching Days and Places for Publick Worship.

THERE is no day commanded in scripture to be kept holy under the gospel but the Lord's day, which is the Christian Sabbath.

Festival days, vulgarly called Holy-days, having no warrant in the word of God, are not to be continued."

In the ideal world, there would not/should not have been "Christmas" celebrations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top