Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some of the orthodox have questioned this doctrine e.g. Calvin, Institutes, Book One, Chapter Thirteen. Calvin apparently held to the eternal generation of the Son's Person, but not His essence.
Some of the orthodox have questioned this doctrine e.g. Calvin, Institutes, Book One, Chapter Thirteen. Calvin apparently held to the eternal generation of the Son's Person, but not His essence.
The fair inference from the Apostle’s words is, that there is a proper subsistence (hypostasis) of the Father, which shines refulgent in the Son. From this, again it is easy to infer that there is a subsistence (hypostasis) of the Son which distinguishes him from the Father. The same holds in the case of the Holy Spirit; for we will immediately prove both that he is God, and that he has a separate subsistence from the Father. This, moreover, is not a distinction of essence, which it were impious to multiply. 1:13.2
So is it possible to deny eternal generation and remain orthodox?
Calvin apparently held to the eternal generation of the Son's Person, but not His essence.