Just for clarification: There is no denying that the super-socialist idea of a so-called "build back better" scheme is being ballyhooed worldwide by progressives. But are you also saying that various trappings typically attached to the movement by conspiracists should also be taken as fact (e.g. covid was intentionally created and spread as a gateway to introducing a new world order that will abolish personal ownership and property rights, impose martial law, impose mandatory vaccination, create isolation camps for people who resist, etc.)?
Brother, I hope this doesn't come off as too rash, but I feel passionate about this. I'm afraid you are missing something.
I know of one reformed pastor who supports and promotes this movement.
Just to be clear, saying we are at war with China (a position I am neither espousing or denying) is not the same thing as saying we are at war with Chinese people. What lunatics like Earnest wish to do with sane people's words is on them, not an unknown poster on a random internet forum. We live in a world where saying that the sky is blue and that there are only two genders makes people burn cities, including some professing Christians. Doesn't mean we should stop saying these things.
The communist pope is a Jesuit. Do you deny that?
I believe I understand what you're saying but I would like to respectfully disagree with you. As Paul says, someone can eat meat and know that it is nothing, but if one goes about eating meat dedicated to false gods in front of others, he causes them to stumble. I agree that ultimately Earnest's sins are on his own head apart from Christ, but his motives didn't come from a vacuum.
Blaming evil on the Jesuits isn't a conspiracy theory, it's a conspiracy fact, as any student of Reformation history knows. But I'm concerned by the trend to believe that the Jesuits are at work in secret cabals. They don't need cabals. They have the Roman Catholic church, the world's largest pedophile cabal. They have universities. They openly influence governments. Their schemes are quite plain. No need to speculate. Jesuits were once banned from every country in Europe (except Russia?), Catholic and Protestant. For good reason, too.
I second the question. It seems there is nowhere to go to be generally certain you are getting good info. To steal a line I heard a few days ago, Whatever the headline, no matter the source, just assume the opposite is true.
Every great writer needs an editor.
OAN and Ruptly are good places to start. You still need discernment, but better than the Lockstep Left media. FreeRepublic for factchecking and discussion of the news (avoid the Religion section - generally hostile to the Reformed viewpoint).
Despite my dismay over conservative-leaning sources that no longer value truth, I find conservative-leaning outlets more likely than liberal ones to hold to the older values about truth. Maybe I'm biased because I'm conservative-leaning myself, but my whole list of national/world news outlets I generally trust is conservative-leaning:
OAN is garbage, or at least it was when I used to catch it here and there in a local Chinese restaurant after the owner started tuning into it. (I think he had satellite. To my knowledge it isn't on cable here and from what I've seen isn't available on any of the streaming services.) I would feel like I lost brain cells every time I watched it. I'd probably be more inclined to tune into RT or even Al Jazeera than watch OAN.
I can’t be certain, and I have no interest in googling it, but from the letters and order employed, I would guess that QAnan is a quality assurance company specializing in assuring the quality of nanny services.
