Something else as I work my way through Gillespie's book on worship. I believe he is referencing a rule of logic here but I could not pull up a standard phrasing in Latin that matches his? Any ideas? It concerns I take it, all the terms being distributed.
[FONT="]There is (I know) such a distinction of pars integralis [formal part], that it is either principalis [principle] and necessaria [necessary], or minus principalis [less principal] and non necessaria; but we cannot understand their pars cultus accidentaria [accidentary part of worship] to be pars integralis non necessaria [a formal but non-necessary part], because, then, their distribution of worship into essential and accidentary parts could not answer to the rules of a just distribution, of which one is, that [/FONT][FONT="]distributio debet exhaurire totum distributum [[/FONT][FONT="]distribution ought to exhaust what is being distributed].[/FONT]