crhoades
Puritan Board Graduate
Originally posted by pastorway
I would presuppose that it has become evident that this is a classically long thread.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by pastorway
I would presuppose that it has become evident that this is a classically long thread.......
A common confusion is that of mixing evidenCES and evidentialISM
Originally posted by Paul manata
Originally posted by puritancovenanter
A common confusion is that of mixing evidenCES and evidentialISM
I think this is part of my problem. Only part. I didn't undertand the differences between the uses of evidences and evidentialism. I still don't understand the relationship between the need or needlessness of evidences. There is obviously a need. Or we couldn't come to any logical conclusions.
no presupp has ever said there isn't a need, or a use for evidenCES. We reject the *methodology* of evidentialISM.
Originally posted by puritancovenanter
Are you asking a convert to presuppose something or arrive at a conclusion or belief based upon pressupositions?
In other words are you just asking someone to believe something just because you believe it? Just because it is supposed truth? i.e. Christianity. Or are you asking someone to believe something about Christ and the Scriptures based upon evidence? i.e. blind faith vs. faith based upon evidence.
Originally posted by puritancovenanter
Let me ask a question. Does Presup Position mean we try to give an apologetic based upon the unbellievers presuppositions, or are we giving an apologetic based upon our presupposition, or are we doing both?