World Cup 2010

Discussion in 'Sports' started by Tripel, Dec 4, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tripel

    Tripel Puritan Board Senior

    Was anyone watching today's draw for the group stage? What an exciting draw for the US! And England!


    We couldn't have asked for much better
  2. T.A.G.

    T.A.G. Puritan Board Freshman

    I'm so stoked...I think we can make it out of it as well!
  3. Scottish Lass

    Scottish Lass Puritan Board Doctor

    I thought our draw went well--no true powerhouses and a decent rivalry in our group. I also appreciated that once the draw began, they proceeded without diverting to musical numbers or whatnot.
  4. JoyFullMom

    JoyFullMom Puritan Board Junior

  5. jambo

    jambo Puritan Board Senior

    Although Scotland won't be there this time (we are taking a rest from big tournaments), I will certainly be supporting the three teams that represent us: Algeria, USA and Slovenia
  6. JonathanHunt

    JonathanHunt Puritan Board Senior

    I love being English. Even our own fellow islanders hate us.

    USA certainly have a good chance of coming second in the group.... :p
  7. ColdSilverMoon

    ColdSilverMoon Puritan Board Senior

    The USA and England are the clear favorites in Group C - arguably the easiest draw in the entire tournament. Finally, after 2 consecutive cups in the "Group of Death," the US has a great chance of not only advancing but winning the group outright.

    I like our chances against England. They haven't played well in the World Cup in years. Please, please, please let David Beckham play!
  8. jambo

    jambo Puritan Board Senior

    Is that 2nd top or bottom?
  9. Timothy William

    Timothy William Puritan Board Junior

    Australia to play Germany, Ghana and Serbia.
  10. LawrenceU

    LawrenceU Puritan Board Doctor

    Stuart, you crack me up!

    I like the grouping. I'm looking forward to this.
  11. Reepicheep

    Reepicheep Puritan Board Freshman

    Drawing England is great! I hope we get all 1776 on 'em (or 1783, 1815, etc.).
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page