TimeRedeemer
Puritan Board Freshman
Well, that explains alot. Thank you for saying you are not well-versed in CT. I might add if that is the case your line and style of corresponding is a little strange. The way you're speaking and making pronouncements doesn't suggest you are giving your own lack of understanding of Covenant Theology much importance. It's a bit irresponsible.
You're also learning things in this thread and then repeating them as if you didn't just learn them. And what's more you're repeating them as if the very person you learned them from doesn't agree with what he just presented to you.
Saying I sound like a theonomist is absurd.
Basically, David, you have to approach subjects with more humility to learn.
If I sound upset it's just that I spent alot of time responding to a person I assumed had some background in the subject and a real position regarding it, and now I feel like I've been spending that time and effort with a person merely doing this:
Still, there are positives to be gained, but continuing with it is not mandatory...
You're also learning things in this thread and then repeating them as if you didn't just learn them. And what's more you're repeating them as if the very person you learned them from doesn't agree with what he just presented to you.
Saying I sound like a theonomist is absurd.
Basically, David, you have to approach subjects with more humility to learn.
If I sound upset it's just that I spent alot of time responding to a person I assumed had some background in the subject and a real position regarding it, and now I feel like I've been spending that time and effort with a person merely doing this:
Still, there are positives to be gained, but continuing with it is not mandatory...