blakerussell
Puritan Board Freshman
I recently heard an unbelieving coworker voice this question.
"If God is all loving- why would he doom his creation to death and sin? He could've prevented this but he didn't."
Another way of rewording his question could be "If God loved Adam, why didn't he take more action in preventing Adam's fall into death."
This question of course seemingly puts the fault on God rather than Adam himself.
How would one answer this question?
God certainly warned Adam that if he ate of the tree, He would surely die.
It's not like Adam was oblivious as to what would happen.
There is also a sense that God wanted to show his creatures just what kind of love he had for them (Romans 5:8) and the only way to demonstrate that was dying for sinful creatures. So then could it be argued that it was indeed loving to let Adam fall- so God could show just what kind of dying love he has for his elect children?
So in effect- the most loving thing God could do is actually allow his creatures to fall into sin- and redeem them- to further reveal just what kind of God He is. Because of this, our happiness might be fuller- because we more fully understand who God is because of the existence of sin.
Kind of an emotionally loaded question that's hard to approach from a human perspective. If someone we loved was heading toward death and destruction- it's likely we would do everything in our power to prevent that from happening.
So. Therein lies the proposed "problem". God either is not all powerful- or he did not love adam because he did not "prevent" his plunge into sin and death and suffering (etc.)
Any help in answering this one would be extremely helpful. I'm not sure if my answers are sufficient.
"If God is all loving- why would he doom his creation to death and sin? He could've prevented this but he didn't."
Another way of rewording his question could be "If God loved Adam, why didn't he take more action in preventing Adam's fall into death."
This question of course seemingly puts the fault on God rather than Adam himself.
How would one answer this question?
God certainly warned Adam that if he ate of the tree, He would surely die.
It's not like Adam was oblivious as to what would happen.
There is also a sense that God wanted to show his creatures just what kind of love he had for them (Romans 5:8) and the only way to demonstrate that was dying for sinful creatures. So then could it be argued that it was indeed loving to let Adam fall- so God could show just what kind of dying love he has for his elect children?
So in effect- the most loving thing God could do is actually allow his creatures to fall into sin- and redeem them- to further reveal just what kind of God He is. Because of this, our happiness might be fuller- because we more fully understand who God is because of the existence of sin.
Kind of an emotionally loaded question that's hard to approach from a human perspective. If someone we loved was heading toward death and destruction- it's likely we would do everything in our power to prevent that from happening.
So. Therein lies the proposed "problem". God either is not all powerful- or he did not love adam because he did not "prevent" his plunge into sin and death and suffering (etc.)
Any help in answering this one would be extremely helpful. I'm not sure if my answers are sufficient.