sotzo
Puritan Board Sophomore
This is perhaps a better-suited topic for the Apologetics Forum...feel free to move it there.
Critics often charge the OT with condoning unwarranted violence, with God commanding Israel to go to war, not just to win but annihilate. While God is sovereign and does as he pleases, I must admit my own wincing sometimes at passages that seem to indicate God's pleasure at the destruction of nations Israel fights.
Joshua 11:10-25, for example:
"10 At that time Joshua turned back and captured Hazor and put its king to the sword. (Hazor had been the head of all these kingdoms.) 11 Everyone in it they put to the sword. They totally destroyed them, not sparing anything that breathed, and he burned up Hazor itself.
12 Joshua took all these royal cities and their kings and put them to the sword. He totally destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the LORD had commanded. 13 Yet Israel did not burn any of the cities built on their mounds—except Hazor, which Joshua burned. 14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, but all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the LORD commanded his servant Moses, so Moses commanded Joshua, and Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the LORD commanded Moses."
I've heard some well-meaning folks respond that these passages relate to countires that oppressed Israel and so their punishment was deserved. This response seems to gloss over the fact that we today pray for an end to wars and a permanent peace. While a permanent peace can never be achieved this side of heaven, we would still say it is our job to spread peace it Jesus' name rather than war and annihilation.
What is an honest response to this observation of the OT text? Is it simply a matter of that time of redemptive history, where Israel needed to secure the promised land?
Critics often charge the OT with condoning unwarranted violence, with God commanding Israel to go to war, not just to win but annihilate. While God is sovereign and does as he pleases, I must admit my own wincing sometimes at passages that seem to indicate God's pleasure at the destruction of nations Israel fights.
Joshua 11:10-25, for example:
"10 At that time Joshua turned back and captured Hazor and put its king to the sword. (Hazor had been the head of all these kingdoms.) 11 Everyone in it they put to the sword. They totally destroyed them, not sparing anything that breathed, and he burned up Hazor itself.
12 Joshua took all these royal cities and their kings and put them to the sword. He totally destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the LORD had commanded. 13 Yet Israel did not burn any of the cities built on their mounds—except Hazor, which Joshua burned. 14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, but all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the LORD commanded his servant Moses, so Moses commanded Joshua, and Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the LORD commanded Moses."
I've heard some well-meaning folks respond that these passages relate to countires that oppressed Israel and so their punishment was deserved. This response seems to gloss over the fact that we today pray for an end to wars and a permanent peace. While a permanent peace can never be achieved this side of heaven, we would still say it is our job to spread peace it Jesus' name rather than war and annihilation.
What is an honest response to this observation of the OT text? Is it simply a matter of that time of redemptive history, where Israel needed to secure the promised land?