John Lafayette Girardeau on justification under the two covenants

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reformed Covenanter

Cancelled Commissioner
It is evident that since the fall no man can be sanctified unless he has been previously justified upon some scheme. In the case of Adam, on the contrary, it was necessary he should be holy, or, what is the same thing, that he should have obeyed the law before he could be justified. His justification in the eye of the law depended on his perfect fulfilment of all its commands, both in the letter and in the spirit.

No less could have been required under the scheme of works upon which he relied for justification. And doubtless Adam was endued with strength sufficient to have enabled him to yield such an obedience, and had he remained in his integrity during the time appointed by God for his trial, he would have been pronounced legally righteous, and confirmed in holiness for eternity. But the moment he broke the law and failed to perform the conditions of the covenant into which he had entered with God, that instant it became absolutely impossible for him to be justified on the scheme under which he hitherto lived.

The order which had previously existed between justification and sanctification was completely reversed, and it became absolutely necessary for him to be justified before he could be sanctified. ...

For more, see:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top