Eyedoc84
Puritan Board Sophomore
I find Turretin’s comments about the uniformity of the Greek in the disputed passages odd, given that the variants were not only known and debated in his day, but had been for over a hundred years.
Regardless, note that when Turretin mentions the infallible “originals”, he means the apographs possessed by the church, not the nonexistent autographs. This was the Reformed view for 300+ years. Muller notes that the modern position of “inerrancy” in the autographa only (Warfield) is a shift from the historic view.
Regardless, note that when Turretin mentions the infallible “originals”, he means the apographs possessed by the church, not the nonexistent autographs. This was the Reformed view for 300+ years. Muller notes that the modern position of “inerrancy” in the autographa only (Warfield) is a shift from the historic view.