What is y’all’s take on when either of these methods of apologetics (Classical and Presuppositional)are to be employed? Would you say one is more effective than the other ? If so, why?
Thank you to all you big brain folk here helping me think through big questions with my small brain haha!
Hebrews 1:3 says God is “upholding all things by the word of his power.” If this is true then it should be for all created things that their existence and continuance has no sufficient explanation in their own created natures, but is due only to God willing them to exist.
Thus if one...
apologetics
aquinas
aristotle
atheism
classicalapologetics
defending the faith
defending your faith
edward feser
god's being
god's existence
light of nature
natural theology
presuppositional
presuppositionalism
proofs for god
reformed thomism
theism
theology proper
thomas aquinas
thomism