biblelighthouse
Puritan Board Junior
I am against women preaching, and I am against women leading Bible studies with men present. The apostle Paul is very clear in the New Testament that God doesn't intend women to teach His Word with authority.
But I ran across 2 Chronicles 34 this afternoon, and I wonder how it fits in with Pauline theology.
2 Chronicles 34:
[22] So Hilki'ah and those whom the king had sent went to Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tokhath, son of Hasrah, keeper of the wardrobe (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the Second Quarter) and spoke to her to that effect.
[23] And she said to them, "Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: `Tell the man who sent you to me,
[24] Thus says the LORD, Behold, I will bring evil upon this place and upon its inhabitants, all the curses that are written in the book which was read before the king of Judah.
[25] Because they have forsaken me and have burned incense to other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands, therefore my wrath will be poured out upon this place and will not be quenched.
[26] But to the king of Judah, who sent you to inquire of the LORD, thus shall you say to him, Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: Regarding the words which you have heard,
[27] because your heart was penitent and you humbled yourself before God when you heard his words against this place and its inhabitants, and you have humbled yourself before me, and have rent your clothes and wept before me, I also have heard you, says the LORD.
[28] Behold, I will gather you to your fathers, and you shall be gathered to your grave in peace, and your eyes shall not see all the evil which I will bring upon this place and its inhabitants.'" And they brought back word to the king.
I realize Huldah was not the pastor of a church. But she does seem to be speaking of God with authority.
So, when some feminist challenges my views by pointing out 2 Chronicles 34, how should I respond to her? How can I demonstrate that this passage has no bearing upon the question of women teaching/preaching in the church?
But I ran across 2 Chronicles 34 this afternoon, and I wonder how it fits in with Pauline theology.
2 Chronicles 34:
[22] So Hilki'ah and those whom the king had sent went to Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tokhath, son of Hasrah, keeper of the wardrobe (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the Second Quarter) and spoke to her to that effect.
[23] And she said to them, "Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: `Tell the man who sent you to me,
[24] Thus says the LORD, Behold, I will bring evil upon this place and upon its inhabitants, all the curses that are written in the book which was read before the king of Judah.
[25] Because they have forsaken me and have burned incense to other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands, therefore my wrath will be poured out upon this place and will not be quenched.
[26] But to the king of Judah, who sent you to inquire of the LORD, thus shall you say to him, Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: Regarding the words which you have heard,
[27] because your heart was penitent and you humbled yourself before God when you heard his words against this place and its inhabitants, and you have humbled yourself before me, and have rent your clothes and wept before me, I also have heard you, says the LORD.
[28] Behold, I will gather you to your fathers, and you shall be gathered to your grave in peace, and your eyes shall not see all the evil which I will bring upon this place and its inhabitants.'" And they brought back word to the king.
I realize Huldah was not the pastor of a church. But she does seem to be speaking of God with authority.
So, when some feminist challenges my views by pointing out 2 Chronicles 34, how should I respond to her? How can I demonstrate that this passage has no bearing upon the question of women teaching/preaching in the church?