Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Am I correct in saying that Christ's human nature died upon the cross but not the second person of the Trinity?
Such a view contradicts Acts 20:28, 1.Cor.2:8c. HE died - the eternal Son of God. HE took upon Himself our human nature, in which HE died, just as WE will partake in the divine nature (2.Peter 1:4).
Christ had to pay the wages of our sin - the divine nature could not have ceased to exist during the period of His bodily death until His resurrection. More than the physical death, He had to suffer Hell on the cross for us.
Matt
I am not sure why you say 'until His resurrection'?
Christ possesses a true human body and a true reasonable soul. He died when His human soul left His human body and went to God. The body was subsequently laid in the grave, and Christ rose again when His soul was reunited to His body.
The divine nature most certainly was not contained within a human body, but the divine nature assumed a true human nature, so that Christ is God and man in two entire distinct natures and one person for ever.
The technical wording is that the person of Christ died when He offered His human nature on the altar of His divine nature, or what Hebrews describes as "through the eternal Spirit." 'Tis the altar which determines the value of the gift. This sacrifice is of infinite value because it is offered on the altar of Christ's infinte nature as God. It is this which gives worth and efficacy to His sufferings, obedience, and intercession on behalf of His people.
Am I correct in saying that Christ's human nature died upon the cross but not the second person of the Trinity?
Do you ever sing the last line of this hymn?
Without making a distinction between the human and divine natures, one falls into either Eutychianism, or Appolinarianism, or possibly Arianism if taken too far. All these are heretical.
The divine nature cannot die. It cannot even have passions or parts, much less die. The human nature, not person, died and was simply attached hypostatically to the divine nature. But if the "person" of Christ died, then God died. If God died, then Neitchie is right and God is dead, and we should all become annihilationists, evolutionists, or some reprobate form of ungodliness because the philosophical, moral and religious implications of a God who can die is ludicrous.