I know my engelish gramma is very bad, but i hope that you can understand my next thoughtt:
..Many time we heard God is love, because he gave his Son for us...
Which is true in relationship to our salvation, but if that is only ment with love, than it means that God "owns" us salvation other wise he would not be love. I think that is not correct, because God is love in his Being in the Triniterian relationship that excist between the father and Son, so if God did not send Jesus He would be still full of Love in His being, and would fullfill complety his righteouness (for the damnation). So that love which is gives for us, in the sending of His Son is not something that God owns to us, or which does God make depended concerning His love, but it is complet free act of grace.
Do you understand what i want to say ? If so, what do you think ?
..Many time we heard God is love, because he gave his Son for us...
Which is true in relationship to our salvation, but if that is only ment with love, than it means that God "owns" us salvation other wise he would not be love. I think that is not correct, because God is love in his Being in the Triniterian relationship that excist between the father and Son, so if God did not send Jesus He would be still full of Love in His being, and would fullfill complety his righteouness (for the damnation). So that love which is gives for us, in the sending of His Son is not something that God owns to us, or which does God make depended concerning His love, but it is complet free act of grace.
Do you understand what i want to say ? If so, what do you think ?
Last edited by a moderator: