kceaster
Puritan Board Junior
I get so lost in all the jargon surrounding apologetics and philosophy, so if y'all would, could you tell me where I'm wrong.
If I use the Bible alone as interpreted through the lense of the Reformation, and I'm not trying to point to any other evidence than what is evident from Scripture, I know this to be presuppositional. But why must we learn the mechanics behind this? Why get bogged down in philosophical terms? If we're to defend the hope we have, and we use the Bible alone, not answering a fool according to his folly, then haven't we done enough?
The reason I ask is because I am woefully stupid when it comes to philosophy. It makes my head hurt.
In Christ,
KC
If I use the Bible alone as interpreted through the lense of the Reformation, and I'm not trying to point to any other evidence than what is evident from Scripture, I know this to be presuppositional. But why must we learn the mechanics behind this? Why get bogged down in philosophical terms? If we're to defend the hope we have, and we use the Bible alone, not answering a fool according to his folly, then haven't we done enough?
The reason I ask is because I am woefully stupid when it comes to philosophy. It makes my head hurt.
In Christ,
KC