Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That video is so sad. It does sound like Dr. Hagee is going to try and explain the Rapturist teaching of how the "Church Age" was God's plan B, only put into effect after the unforeseen rejection of Christ. I have met many in the Dispensational camp who have never been taught that their Theology teaches that Christ failed and that is why we have to finish the Church age and be Raptured before God the Father can finish his work with His true Love, Israel.
What a bummer. He used to be a decent preacher. Before he got on TBN and famous. I saw him when I lived in Texas. Absolute TBN corrupts absolutly!
"I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!" 59At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.
running greedily in the error of balaam...
Chaplainintraining
Puritanboard Freshman
He is not saying that. I can't remember exactly how he put it, but it was something along the lines of, "Jesus did not come to be the Messiah for Israel. This means they did not kill their Messiah. Therefore the rejection of Jesus cannot be held against them. We have to be nice to Israel."
The Jews cannot be blamed for rejecting what was not offered (a Messiah)?
Huh?
John 8:58
"I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!" 59At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.
He said this while "in the temple area" and among "teachers of the Law and Pharisees." I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure that's a fairly Jewish setting.
Chaplainintraining
Puritanboard Freshman
He is not saying that. I can't remember exactly how he put it, but it was something along the lines of, "Jesus did not come to be the Messiah for Israel. This means they did not kill their Messiah. Therefore the rejection of Jesus cannot be held against them. We have to be nice to Israel."
I realize you are not defending this, only explaining the author's rationalizing of it for the book sales.
Who else was expecting the Messiah?
His first name Jesus, His title was "Christ" (which means Messiah).
In Matthew 16:16 Peter (Jewish) recognizes Jesus the Messiah as the Messiah (of Israel) and is commended for God revealing it to Him.
This is an absurd rationalization by this gentleman. I would like to be charitable but, more I consider this, it seems outright heresy.